Rakeback | Blogs
Pokersavvy. You play. We pay

 
 
Home
  
 
  
 
Forum
  
 
  
 
Pros
  
 
Get Plus Free
   
 
Rakeback
   
 
Join
 
 

Foucault Just another PokerSavvy weblog

20Jul/100
Share: 
  Digg 
  Facebook 
  Twitter 
  Google 
  E-mail 


Deep Bluff

PokerStars No-Limit Hold’em, $4.00 BB (2 handed) – Poker-Stars Converter Tool from PokerSavvyPlus.com

BB ($1000)
Hero (SB) ($1807.80)

Preflop: Hero is SB with 10, 6
Hero bets $12, BB calls $8

Flop: ($25.60) 3, 5, 6 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $19, BB raises to $64, Hero calls $45

Turn: ($153.60) 4 (2 players)
BB bets $72, Hero raises to $211, BB calls $139

River: ($575.60) J (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $1520 (All-In), 1 fold

Total pot: $575.60 | Rake: $0.50

Results:
Hero didn’t show 10, 6 (nothing).
Outcome: Hero won $575.10

I don’t think there are many 7’s in his flop check-raising range. I could see him having 74s if he calls that pre-flop or 87 but probably not a hand like K7 or 75. I expected that he would shove 87 over a turn raise, but that if he just called the turn raise, I could shove unpaired rivers and win a large percentage of the time. Granted I sometimes have the best hand anyway on the turn, but that’s kind of irrelevant since it’s vulnerable and I don’t think I can call a river bet. So I turn it into a bluff on the turn, and once he calls, I expect him to have two pair or a set. The turn bet sizing is pretty consistent with that as well.

The overbet on the river (it’s about $750 into $500) is some extra encouragement for him to fold. Honestly I don’t think I’m playing a bare 7 like this. If I raise the turn for value, I have either 87 or a 7 with a heart draw. I felt shoving the river was more consistent with the 87 and also would get disproportionate folds even if he did manage some good handreading and put me on a narrow range.

Comments (0) Trackbacks (0)

No comments yet.


Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trackbacks are disabled.